Legal Opinion

Pirscher v. Casualty Co. of America

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 15, 1917PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. (Stanton, L) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtStockbridge, J.

William F. Pirseher was insured with the Casualty Company of America under a policy commonly known as an accident and health policy. By paragraph J of that policy it was provided that

“if bodily disease or illness * * * shall wholly prevent the assured from performing any and every kind of duty pertaining to his occupation, for not less than one week, the company will pay him the minimum weekly indemnity for the period of continuous total disability during which he shall be necessarily confined to the house, not exceeding twenty-six consecutive weeks.”

The policy was issued on the 21st of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lobdill v. Laboring Men's Mutual Aid Ass'n of ChatfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  2. Rocci v. Massachusetts Accident Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. Dunning v. Massachusetts Mutual Accident Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1904
  4. Hoffman v. Michigan Home & Hospital Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Bradshaw v. American Benevolent Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sheets v. Farmers & Merchants Mutual Life & Casualty Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  2. Federal Surety Co. v. WaiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. MilderNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Stewart v. Continental Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Collis v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API