Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Continental Casualty Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1926No. 20134. Department TwoPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff, Miss Stewart, commenced this action in the superior court for King county, seeking recovery from the defendant casualty company upon certain health insurance provisions of a policy issued to her by that company. A trial upon the merits in the superior court, sitting without a jury, resulted in findings and judgment awarding recovery to Miss Stewart in the sum of $1,866.67, as a balance due under the policy for her loss of time from her occupation, during which she was totally disabled by sickness and continuously confined within the house under the regular care of a legally…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Rocci v. Massachusetts Accident Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Jennings v. Brotherhood Accident Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  3. Reeves v. Midland Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Great Eastern Casualty Co. v. RobinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  5. Sheets v. Farmers & Merchants Mutual Life & Casualty Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Wade v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Bankson v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  3. Purcell v. Washington Fidelity National InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Albert v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Franklin Life Ins. Co. v. LewisAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API