Legal Opinion

Opoku-Agyeman v. Perez

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided July 24, 2012No. Case No. 12-06006-CV-SJ-GAFPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

GARY A. FENNER, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is Defendants Nelson Perez, Citizenship & Immigration Services, Alejandro Mayorkas, and Janet Napolitano’s (collectively “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. (Doc. # 5). Plaintiffs Kwabena Opoku-Agyeman (“Plaintiff’) and Maud Opoku-Agyeman (“Ms. Opoku-Agyeman”) oppose. (Doc. # 9). For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED.

DISCUSSION

I. FACTS

On October 26, 2007, Plaintiff submitted a Form 1-130 to the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Lutwak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Holden v. HirnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  5. Woodsmith Publishing Co. v. Meredith CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brinklys v. JohnsonDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2016
  2. Khalid v. DHS, USA, & USCISDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2014
  3. Mamedova v. USCISDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025
  4. Singh v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API