Legal Opinion

Romero v. Dalton

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1886No. Civil No. 172PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the First Judicial District in and for the County of Pima. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.

In this action the plaintiff, Romero, sues Dalton for ,the value of a share of a crop of wheat. The evidence shows that on the eleventh of August, 1885, Romero and Dalton made a contract in writing as follows: Dalton was to plow and sow in wheat two certain fields. Romero was to fence the exterior of said fields that may be without fence, and was to attend to the crop at his own expense, paying for water and keeping irrigating canals open; was to cut and harvest the crop, and was to furnish two men during the plowing season. The harvest was to be divided into two parts. The contract was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alwood v. RuckmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Aiken v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1849
  3. Tanner v. HillsNew York Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Industrial Commission v. MeddockArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Ellis v. BinghamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  3. Gray v. RobinsonArizona Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Wagner v. ButtlesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  5. S. A. Gerrard Co. v. CannonArizona Supreme Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API