Legal Opinion

Sipl v. Sentry Indemnity Co.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided September 12, 1988No. 87-2257PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFine, J.

Sentry Indemnity Company appeals from a November 13, 1987 order of the trial court, which declared that Robert Sipl had uninsured motorist coverage under an automobile policy issued to his mother. On January 26,1988, this court permitted an interlocutory appeal under Rule 808.03(2), Stats. The only issue the parties have raised with respect to their request for declaratory relief, either here or in the trial court, is the issue of coverage. However, the dispositive issue here is whether the trial court had jurisdiction to declare the rights of the parties. We conclude that the trial court…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Loy v. BundersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Eberhardy v. Circuit Court for Wood CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State ex rel. La Follette v. DammannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  4. State Ex Rel. Lynch v. ContaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Heller v. ShapiroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Green County Department of Human Services v. H.N.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Dieck v. Unified School District of AntigoCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
  3. Putnam v. Time Warner Cable of Southeastern Wisconsin, Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  4. Ross v. Honey Lake Protection & Rehabilitation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  5. Wisconsin Education Ass'n Council v. Wisconsin State Elections BoardCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API