Putnam v. Time Warner Cable of Southeastern Wisconsin, Ltd. Partnership
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtCurley, J.
¶ 1. Kerry L. Putnam, Carol L.
Smith-Carter, and Louis Boutan, individually and on *46behalf of a putative c lass of customers (collectively, "the customers"), of Time Warner Cable of Southeastern Wisconsin, Limited Partnership (Time Warner), appeal from the circuit court judgment dismissing their action against Time Warner. The customers argue that the circuit court erred in concluding that the "voluntary payment doctrine" precluded their action to: (1) recover the amount of monthly late-fee payments they made that was not reasonably related to Time Warner's actual costs; and (2) obtain…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Loy v. BundersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Lister v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin SystemWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Wausau Tile, Inc. v. County Concrete Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- Smith v. Prime Cable of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Wassenaar v. PanosWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Putnam v. Time Warner Cable of Southeastern Wisconsin, Ltd. PartnershipWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Time Warner Entertainment Co. v. WhitemanIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- MBS-Certified Public Accountants, LLC v. Wisconsin Bell Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- Pietroske, Inc. v. Globalcom, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
- BRB Contractors, Inc. v. WEB Water Development Association, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.