Legal Opinion

Domocaris v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 4, 1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

The exceptions to the denial of the defendant’s motions for a nonsuit and a directed verdict, and to the charge, present the same question. The evidence fully warranted the finding of the jury that the plaintiff and the assured correctly stated the true facts to the agent, and that he wrote false answers in the application and falsely interpreted to the medical examiner. The question, therefore, for consideration is whether the defendant under such circumstances is liable.

Section 1, chapter 109, of the Laws of 1907 provides that “Any person who shall solicit an application for insurance upon…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. New York Life Insurance v. FletcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Continental Life Insurance v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Insurance Company v. MahoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  5. Pfiester v. Missouri State Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Invest Almaz v. Temple-Inland Forest Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  2. Karp v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933
  3. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance v. GruetteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  4. Rust v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1934
  5. Bilodeau v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API