Legal Opinion

Cockrill v. California

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 11, 1925No. 182PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler

Plaintiffs in error were convicted in the superior court of Sonoma County, California, of conspiracy to effect a transfer of real property in violation of the Alien Land Law of that State. Judgment was affirmed by the district court of appeal. 62 Cal. App. 22. A petition to have the case heard and determined in the Supreme Court of California was denied. The case is here on writ of error. § 237, Judicial Code.

Under the Alien Land Law, Japanese subjects who are not eligible to citizenship under the laws of the United States are not permitted to acquire, use or control agricultural lands in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Terrace v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City Railroad v. TurnipseedSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Webb v. O'BRIENSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Porterfield v. Webb, Attorney General of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Morrison v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Oyama v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Palermo v. Stockton Theatres, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Ohio Ex Rel. Clarke v. DeckebachSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Sei Fujii v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API