Legal Opinion

Dauterman v. State-Record Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 30, 1967No. 18660PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order of the circuit court, which will be reported herewith, granting respondent’s motion for a judgment non obstante veredicto in a libel action. We have carefully considered the record, as well as the briefs of counsel, and conclude that there was no error on the part of the circuit court in granting a judgment for respondent.

Under all of the circumstances reflected by the record, we think the circuit judge correctly concluded that the language complained of was not actionable, but, even if the statement as to the appellant “drinking 'quite a bit’ Monday” be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. Furman UniversitySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  2. McGregor v. State Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
  3. Costas v. Florence Printing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  4. Jackson v. Record Publishing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  5. Murphy v. News and Courier CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Holtzscheiter v. Thomson Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Capps v. WattsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  3. John Paul Anderson v. Stanco Sports Library, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
  4. Parker v. Evening Post Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  5. Ross v. Columbia Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API