Legal Opinion
Partnership 92 LP v. State of New York Division of Housing & Community Renewal
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 2, 2008PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
By its terms, the Rent Regulation Reform Act of 1997 (L 1997, ch 116) applies to any proceeding that was pending before the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal at the time of its enactment, as this case was (see Matter of Gilman v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 99 NY2d 144, 149 [2002]). Moreover, there was ample basis on this record for the Division to conclude that, in arguing for a higher base rent, the owner had relied on an illusory tenancy. It was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gilman v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Thornton v. BaronNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
3Cited by40 opinions
- Conason v. Megan Holding, LLCNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
- People v. KindredAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Burrows v. 75-25 153rd St., LLCNew York Court of Appeals · 2025
- Matter of Woodson v. Town of RiverheadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Columbus 95th Street, LLC v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.