Legal Opinion

Spooner v. Cross

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 8, 1905PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from'Mills District Court. — bloN. N. W. Macy, Judge. ActioN for specific performance. Relief denied, and plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

On the 24th day of January, 1903, the parties hereto entered into a written contract by the terms of which defendant agreed to purchase 560 acres of land in Saline county, Mo., for the consideration of $20,400, and a grain and milling plant valued at $16,000. No time was fixed for performance, but on'February 27th, in pursuance of an oral understanding, title to 480 acres of land was con*260veyed to defendant, and be deeded to plaintiffs tbe grain and milling plant, and paid $15,200 in casb. It was then agreed tbat plaintiff should fix up tbe abstract on tbe remaining 80 acres in 30 days. On tbe…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lessenich v. SellersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fagan v. HookSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. Ogooshevitz v. ArnoldMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Howe v. CoatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  4. Waters v. PearsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  5. Tucker v. ThravesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API