Legal Opinion

Blankenship v. Kansas Explorations, Inc.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 9, 1930PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action for damages alleged to have been caused by the mining operations of defendant, in running and dumping sludge and debris into the mill pond of plaintiffs whereby, it is charged, the pond was so far filled as to destroy the water power by which plaintiffs had operated a custom or grist mill. The appeal of defendant is from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs in the sum of $10,000.

The plaintiffs, husband and wife, were owners in fee simple of a tract of twenty-four acres of land extending upon both sides of Center Creek, a non-navigable stream in Jasper County. A dam…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Paddock v. SomesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  2. Finney v. BerrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  3. Powers v. City of Council BluffsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  4. Harvey v. Mason City & Fort Dodge RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  5. Soulard v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Harrisonville v. W. S. Dickey Clay Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Beetschen v. Shell Pipe Line CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  3. Shelley v. Ozark Pipe Line CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  4. Fletcher v. City of IndependenceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Aetna Life Insurance Company v. McLaughlinTexas Supreme Court · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API