Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Seneca Falls Central School District & Lorenz
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 17, 1983PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Daniel A. DePasquale, J.
The petitioner brings this action at Special Term pursuant to the provisions of CPLR 7503 (subd [b]), to stay arbitration proceedings involving two separate demands for arbitration filed by the respondents, Dorothy Lorenz and her designated representative, Karen Kelley. The petitioner, Seneca Falls Central School District, employs the respondent, Dorothy Lorenz, as a library aide and she is also a member of the CSEA, Local 850, AFSCME/AFLCIO (hereinafter referred to as Local 850).. Pursuant to the provisions of the collective bargaining agreement…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between the Acting Superintendent of Schools of Liverpool Central School District v. United Liverpool Faculty Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Parker v. BorockNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Gangel v. DeGrootNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- In the Arbitration between Franklin Central School & Franklin Teachers Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- American General Ins. Co. v. WebsterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cox v. Howard, Weil, Labouisse, Friedrichs, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1993
- Roc Nation LLC v. HCC International Insurance Company, PLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021