Legal Opinion

Eustis v. Park-O-Lator Corp.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1967PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

The defendant Park-O-Lator Corporation was formed to exploit a conveyor system for vehicle parking invented by the defendant Abe Zaha. The plaintiff Enstis paid $4,000 for 50 shares of stock in the defendant corporation; the plaintiffs Slavich did likewise. Ensti-s, in addition, advanced the corporation $1,100 and the Slaviches advanced $350. Corporate notes were delivered to plaintiffs evidencing the debts created by the making of these advances. The individual parties entered into agreements providing that the corporation would deliver notes for $4,000 each to plaintiffs and that the Zahas,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Somers v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Dykes v. Clem Lumber Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Michelin Tire Co. v. FisherOregon Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Field v. HaupertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  2. Sumner v. Enercon Development CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Sumner v. Enercon Development Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. Umpqua Bank v. Charles A. Gunzel III and Ginelle F. GunzelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  5. Umpqua Bank v. Charles A. Gunzel III and Ginelle F. GunzelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API