Legal Opinion

Dinhofer v. Medical Liability Mutual Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 9, 2012PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*481Plaintiff’s claims against the MLMIC defendants of fraud, deceitful business practices, and breach of their duty to defend him in good faith are barred by the doctrine of equitable estoppel. The MLMIC defendants established that in reasonable reliance upon plaintiff’s execution of the consent to settle the underlying medical malpractice action they made a prejudicial change in their position by, inter alia, disbanding the advisory committee that, pursuant to the policy, would have resolved the matter of settlement absent plaintiff’s consent, and paying to settle the claim against him (see…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. AmBase Corp. v. Davis Polk & WardwellNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Leder v. SpiegelNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. InKine Pharmaceutical Co. v. ColemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. In re GuttenplanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. River Seafoods, Inc. v. JPMorgan Chase BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cusack v. Greenberg Traurig, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Gourary v. GreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  3. Megibow v. Caron.OrgAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. 737 Park Avenue Acquisition LLC v. ShalovAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. 737 Park Avenue Acquisition LLC v. ShalovAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API