Leder v. Spiegel
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
After unsuccessfully representing two objectants at a will contest trial in Surrogate’s Court, respondent attorney petitioned the same court for legal fees. In their answer, objectants counterclaimed for legal malpractice, arguing that, but for respondent’s negligent representation, they would have accepted a $108,000 settlement. In particular, objectants cited respondent’s failure to anticipate that Surrogate’s Court would not admit certain evidence. Respondent moved pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a)…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- AmBase Corp. v. Davis Polk & WardwellNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
3Cited by84 opinions
- Dempster v. LiottiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Bua v. Purcell & Ingrao, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Barnett v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Henneberry v. BorsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Federal Insurance v. North American Specialty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.