Wagonblast v. Whitney
Oregon Supreme Court
Wasco County. Plaintiff appeals. _ The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLobd, J.
This was a suit to compel the specific performance of a verbal contract to convey lands. For the purpose of showing the nature of the agreement, and the grounds upon which the enforcement of the contract is claimed, the facts alleged are in substance: —
That on the-day of-, 1877 (the exact date plaintiff is not able to state), one J. M. Bird was in the rightful and exclusive possession of the following described lands, in said county of Wasco, to wit, the north half of the northwest quarter and the northeast quarter of the northwest qparterof section 14, in township 1 north, of range 13 east…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Semmes v. WorthingtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
- Wright v. PucketSupreme Court of Virginia · 1872
- Mathews v. JarrettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882
- Brown v. LordOregon Supreme Court · 1879
- Horn v. LudingtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Phillips v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Cooper v. ThomasonOregon Supreme Court · 1896
- Tigglebeck v. RussellOregon Supreme Court · 1949
- Leadbetter v. PriceOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Sorenson v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1913
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.