Feinstein v. Goebel
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Herbert A. Posner, J.
This is a motion by the plaintiffs, Herbert and Helen Feinstein, to set aside a jury verdict in favor of the defendants, Doctors Harold and David Goebel.
The Feinsteins claim, that they were severely prejudiced by the admission into evidence of two words of a hearsay statement contained within Herbert Feinstein’s hospital record. These two words were "drank heavy”. Plaintiffs had no objec*463tion to the introduction by the defendant of the balance of the hospital record.
FACTS
Herbert Feinstein became a regular patient of the two defendant doctors in February…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Johnson v. LutzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Williams v. AlexanderNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
- Gunn v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Mikel v. Flatbush General HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Castro v. Alden Leeds, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re A.M.New York City Family Court · 2014
- Matter of RedactedNew York Supreme Court, Kings County · 2025