Legal Opinion

Feinstein v. Goebel

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1989PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Herbert A. Posner, J.

This is a motion by the plaintiffs, Herbert and Helen Feinstein, to set aside a jury verdict in favor of the defendants, Doctors Harold and David Goebel.

The Feinsteins claim, that they were severely prejudiced by the admission into evidence of two words of a hearsay statement contained within Herbert Feinstein’s hospital record. These two words were "drank heavy”. Plaintiffs had no objec*463tion to the introduction by the defendant of the balance of the hospital record.

FACTS

Herbert Feinstein became a regular patient of the two defendant doctors in February…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. LutzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Williams v. AlexanderNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Gunn v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Mikel v. Flatbush General HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  5. Castro v. Alden Leeds, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re A.M.New York City Family Court · 2014
  2. Matter of RedactedNew York Supreme Court, Kings County · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API