Legal Opinion

Matthews v. DeSoto

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1986No. C-5809PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a prejudgment interest case. The court of appeals stated that a trial court may reduce or eliminate a plaintiff’s prejudgment interest award upon a finding that the plaintiff used dilatory tactics in bad faith to prevent resolution of the lawsuit. 714 S.W.2d 133.

In Cavnar v. Quality Control Parking, Inc., 696 S.W.2d 549, 554 (Tex.1985), we held that a prevailing plaintiff may recover prejudgment interest on damages that have accrued by the time of judgment. We reviewed various methods of determining the exact amount of prejudgment interest, including allowing the trial court to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cavnar v. Quality Control Parking, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. DeSoto v. Matthews, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. C & H NATIONWIDE, INC. v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,372 Executone Information Systems, Inc. v. Lloyd K. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  3. C & C Partners v. Sun Exploration & Production Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
  4. Enterprise-Laredo Associates v. Hachar's, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1992
  5. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Wilson, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API