Legal Opinion
Platte River Whooping Crane Critical Habitat Maintenance Trust v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, State of Wyoming, Central Nebraska Public Power and Irrigation District, Nebraska Public Power District, Nebraska Water Users, Inc., Intervenors. Nebraska Wildlife Federation, Sierra Club, National Audubon Society, American Rivers, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, State of Wyoming, Nebraska Public Power District, Central Nebraska Public Power and Irrigation District, Intervenors. Central Nebraska Public Power and Irrigation District v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, State of Wyoming, Nebraska Public Power District, Central Nebraska Public Power and Irrigation District, Nebraska Water Users, Inc., Nebraska Wildlife Federation, Sierra Club, National Audubon Society, American Rivers, Inc., Intervenors. Nebraska Public Power District v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, State of Wyoming, Central Nebraska Public Power and Irrigation District, Nebraska Public Power District, National Audubon Society, Nebraska Wildlife Federation, Sierra Club, American Rivers, Inc., Intervenors. Platte River Whooping Crane Critical Habitat Maintenance Trust v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Central Nebraska Public Power and Irrigation District, State of Wyoming, Nebraska Public Power District, Nebraska Water Users, Inc., Intervenors
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 23, 1992No. 90-1397PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
962 F.2d 27
295 U.S.App.D.C. 218, 22 Envtl. L. Rep. 21,167
PLATTE RIVER WHOOPING CRANE CRITICAL HABITAT MAINTENANCE
TRUST, Petitioner,
v.
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent,
State of Wyoming, Central Nebraska Public Power and
Irrigation District, Nebraska Public Power
District, Nebraska Water Users, Inc.,
Intervenors.
NEBRASKA WILDLIFE FEDERATION, Sierra Club, National Audubon
Society, American Rivers, Inc., Petitioners,
v.
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent,
State of Wyoming, Nebraska Public Power District, Central
Nebraska Public Power and Irrigation District,
Intervenors.
CENTRAL…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Defenders of Wildlife Center for Biological Diversity Craig Miller v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, National Association of Home Builders State of Arizona Arizona Chamber of Commerce, Intervenors. Defenders of Wildlife Center for Biological Diversity, Plaintiffs-Petitioners v. Robert B. Flowers, Chief of Engineers and Commander, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers., Defendant-Respondent, Christine Todd Whitman, Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Defendant-Respondent, Gale Norton Steven Williams, Defendants-Respondents, Continental Reserve Ii, Llc, Defendant-Intervenor/intervenor, Hb Land Development Company Stephen A. Owens, State of Arizona, Ex-Rel, Director Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Grosvenor Holdings National Association of Home Builders Home Builders Association of Central Arizona Southern Arizona Home Builders Association Saguaro Ranch Investments LLC Saguaro Ranch Development Corporation, Defendant-Intervenors/intervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Defenders of Wildlife v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005