Legal Opinion

McNabb v. Niagara Fire Insurance

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 11, 1929PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArnold, J.

This is a suit based upon an alleged oral contract of insurance. Defendant is a corporation created under the laws of the State of New York, duly licensed and authorized to do business in the State of Missouri, and is engaged in writing fire insurance.

On December 28, 1927, plaintiff made application to one George A. Tate, defendant’s agent at Unionville, Missouri, for insurance on his persona] property located on his father’s farm, of which plaintiff was a tenant. An application was signed, listing the following property: $600 on grain and seeds of all kinds; $400 on harness, machinery and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Banks v. Clover Leaf Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Murphy v. Great American InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Sheets v. Iowa State InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Hawes v. American Central InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Weston v. American InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Huppert v. WolfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Katz Drug Co. v. Commercial Standard Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Chailland v. M. F. A. Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  4. Bearup v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of the U.S.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  5. Bennett v. National Fire InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API