Bearup v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of the U.S.
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
The issue presented is whether a certain contract of insurance is a New York or Missouri contract, and, consequently, governed by the law of New York or of Missouri. The insurer's demurrer to the named beneficiary's assignee's (hereinafter designated beneficiary) petition was sustained. The following is the effect of the allegations in the petition.
Insurer's agent secured insured's application on February 11, 1935, at Kansas City, Missouri, for a $5,000 ordinary life insurance policy, carrying double indemnity accidental death benefits. Insured's application for insurance to insurer recited…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Daggett v. Kansas City Structural Steel Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- Cleaver v. Central States Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
- Rhodus v. Kansas City Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
- Keim v. Home Mutual Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
- Vanderberg v. Kansas City, Missouri, Gas Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ransom v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Miller v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1980
- Turner v. Worth Insurance CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- MacY v. DayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
- McAvoy Vitrified Brick Co. v. North American Life Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.