Legal Opinion

Howard Gault & Son, Inc. v. Metcalf

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 31, 1975No. 8631PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELLIS, Chief Justice.

The original mandamus proceeding is brought by relator, Howard Gault and Son, Inc., seeking to compel the Honorable Michael P. Metcalf, in his capacity as Judge of the 69th Judicial District Court in and for Deaf Smith County, Texas, to proceed to trial as to all three defendants in pending Cause No. 6697, styled Howard Gault and Son, Inc. v. First National Bank of Hereford, Texas, Pitman Grain Company and T. B. Thomas, Jr., rather than as to T. B. Thomas, Jr., the only party affirmatively granted a new trial. Writ refused.

At a previous jury trial, the trial court…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Pan American Petroleum Corporation v. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Kansas University Endowment Ass'n v. KingTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  3. H. B. Zachry Co. v. ThibodeauxTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Wootters v. KauffmanTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Cowart v. MeeksTexas Supreme Court · 1938

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Strackbein v. PrewittTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Professional Microfilming, Inc. v. HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  3. Howard v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  4. Farmer Foundation Co. v. Leach, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
  5. in Re Taylor Morrison of Texas, Inc. D/B/A Morrison Homes, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API