Legal Opinion

Cowart v. Meeks

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1938No. 6994PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge German

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

The Court of Civil Appeals has made a very concise and accurate statement of the essential facts, and we adopt substantially all of same without the use of quotation marks.

The Harlingen Hotel Company, Inc., was the owner and operator of the Madison Hotel, located in the city of Harlingen, Texas. J. N. Meeks entered into a written contract with the Harlingen Hotel Company to make certain repairs and alterations upon the Madison Hotel, which consisted principally in the removal of the second and third stories of one…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kruse v. Houston & T. C. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  2. Mendoza v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Meeks v. CowartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. McNulty v. HurleySupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. Post v. LunneySupreme Court of Florida · 1972
  3. Burton Construction & Shipbuilding Co. v. BroussardTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Schroeder v. Texas & Pacific Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  5. Fisher Construction Company v. RiggsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API