Legal Opinion

Bornstein v. Metropolitan Bottling Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 3, 1958PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

26 N.J. 263 (1958)

139 A.2d 404

JEROLD BORNSTEIN, AN INFANT, BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, SIDNEY BORNSTEIN, AND SIDNEY BORNSTEIN, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

v.

METROPOLITAN BOTTLING COMPANY, INC., A BODY CORPORATE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued December 16, 1957.

Decided March 3, 1958.

Mr. James J. Langan argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Emory, Langan, Lamb & Blake, attorneys).

Mr. William A. Davenport argued the cause for respondents.

The opinion of the court was delivered by HEHER, J.

The Appellate Division of the Superior Court affirmed a judgment for…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bornstein v. Metropolitan Bottling Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  2. Payne v. Rome Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  3. Graham v. BadgerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  4. Hughes v. Atlantic City & Shore RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
  5. Bradley v. Conway Springs Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1941

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wollerman v. Grand Union Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API