Bornstein v. Metropolitan Bottling Co., Inc.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
26 N.J. 263 (1958)
139 A.2d 404
JEROLD BORNSTEIN, AN INFANT, BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, SIDNEY BORNSTEIN, AND SIDNEY BORNSTEIN, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
METROPOLITAN BOTTLING COMPANY, INC., A BODY CORPORATE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued December 16, 1957.
Decided March 3, 1958.
Mr. James J. Langan argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Emory, Langan, Lamb & Blake, attorneys).
Mr. William A. Davenport argued the cause for respondents.
The opinion of the court was delivered by HEHER, J.
The Appellate Division of the Superior Court affirmed a judgment for…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bornstein v. Metropolitan Bottling Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Payne v. Rome Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Graham v. BadgerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Hughes v. Atlantic City & Shore RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
- Bradley v. Conway Springs Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1941
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wollerman v. Grand Union Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1966