Legal Opinion

Martinez v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided December 3, 2004No. 07-04-0305-CRPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

BRIAN QUINN, Justice.

Edward L. Martinez, appellant, filed with this court various documents involving his appellate counsel and the appellate brief filed by him. In them, he contends that his counsel, Ronald Delarose, “plain out lie[d]” in and “omitted facts from” the brief as well as denied him effective assistance of counsel “on first appeal.” He also posits that his attorney failed to raise issues “that he should have brought up.” Along with these allegations appear requests that Delarose “withdraw or abate the appeal,” that Delarose amend the brief, that the clerk…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Webb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. Rudd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Hubbard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Fewins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
  2. Alanda Suzanne Fewins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
  3. Barski, Christopher AnthonyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  4. Carl Wade Curry v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2012
  5. Carl Wade Curry v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API