Legal Opinion
Cobb v. Newman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 8, 1949No. 33391PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
This action was instituted by Louesa Newman, joined by her husband, Nelson Newman; Pauline Palmer, joined by her husband, W. S. Palmer; and Mary Inez Temple, joined by her husband, W. H. Temple, as plain*319tiffs, against Antonia Cobb and her husband, J. R. Cobb; L. C. Kuyrken-dall and his wife, lone Kuyrkendall, and O. A. Kuyrkendall and his wife, Josephine Kuyrkendall. Therein is sought a judicial determination of. the respective interests of plaintiffs and defendants in the mineral estate in lands, also judgments for plaintiffs’ alleged proportionate parts of money received by one of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Marsh v. WhitmoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Barnes v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
- Hoyt v. LathamSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- In Re Will of FrissSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Shipp v. Southeastern Oklahoma Industries AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
- Noble v. NobleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- English v. RainwaterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Clements v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Darden v. GriffisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.