Legal Opinion

In Re Will of Friss

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 8, 1914No. 3809PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; W. R. Taylor, Judge- Petition of George .Friss for a construction of the will of MJaria A. Friss.

1Opinion of the CourtRiddle, J.

Plaintiff in error will be referred to as petitioner, and defendants in error as respondents. This proceeding in qrror is prosecuted from a judgment of the district court of Oklahoma county, denying the relief sought by petitioner. Maria F. Friss executed her will on October 26, 1906, and named as beneficiaries therein petitioner, also her sons, Myron, Charlie, and her daughter, Emma. On the 14th day of September, 1910, petitioner, George Friss, instituted proceedings in the county court for the purpose of having the court construe and give effect to the will involved and to 'distribute the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Estate of GrannissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Whiton v. . SnyderNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Union National Bank v. LyonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  4. Sevier v. WoodsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  5. State ex rel. Otis v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
  2. Noble v. NobleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  3. Gormly v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  4. Cobb v. NewmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  5. Hicks v. Fairbanks' HeirsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API