Holtzman v. Supreme Court
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Peter P. Rosato, J.
Plaintiff Holtzman, in her official capacity as District Attorney of Kings County, seeks a judgment pursuant to CPLR 3001, (1) declaring that both the United States and New York State Constitutions prohibit defense counsel from exercising "race-based” peremptory challenges, i.e., using peremptory challenges to exclude prospective jurors on the basis of race, or for that matter, on the basis of sex, religion, or national origin; (2) declaring that the Judges and Justices named herein are not to grant peremptory challenges without making further inquiry…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. KernAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. DavisNew York Supreme Court · 1988
- Ferrer v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1996
- People v. Piermont, New York County Courts1989
- Holtzman v. Supreme CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989