Legal Opinion

Holtzman v. Supreme Court

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 31, 1989PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for a judgment declaring, inter alia, that judicial enforcement of peremptory challenges by criminal defendants and their counsel to exclude prospective jurors on the basis of race, religion, sex, or national origin violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Federal and State Constitutions, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rosato, J.), rendered March 7, 1988, which granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Morgenthau v. ErlbaumNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. KernAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Bartley v. WalentasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  4. Todd v. Board of Education of the City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. People v. Gary M.New York Supreme Court · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Plander Lanes, Inc. v. BellamoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Breslin Brookhaven, LLC v. RoseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API