Legal Opinion

Reagan v. District of Columbia

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 2, 1914No. 2573PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In Error to the Police Court for the District of Columbia. The Court in the opinion stated the facts as follows: This action arose in the police court of the District of Columbia upon a criminal information charging Bernard Reagan, plaintiff in error, hereafter referred to as defendant, with a violation of the provisions of the act of Congress approved February 4, 1913 (37 Stat. at L. 657, chap. 26), commonly known as the “Loan Shark Law.” The information is in three counts.

Read the full summary

In Error to the Police Court for the District of Columbia. The Court in the opinion stated the facts as follows: This action arose in the police court of the District of Columbia upon a criminal information charging Bernard Reagan, plaintiff in error, hereafter referred to as defendant, with a violation of the provisions of the act of Congress approved February 4, 1913 (37 Stat. at L. 657, chap. 26), commonly known as the “Loan Shark Law.” The information is in three counts. In the first count, defendant is charged with making a loan to one Joseph P. Cullen and one Robert E. Bender, in the…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Van Orsdkl

The act of Congress provides, among other things, “that hereafter it shall be unlawful and illegal to engage in the District of Columbia in the business of loaning money upon which a rate of interest greater than six per centum per annum is charged on any security of any kind, direct or collateral, tangible or intangible, without procuring license; and all persons, firms, voluntary associations, joint-stock companies, incorporated societies, and corporations engaged in said business shall pay a license tax of five hundred dollars per annum to the District of Columbia. * * * That no such…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Patsone v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Central Lumber Co. v. South DakotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Griffith v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. Rosenthal v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Noteman v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1939
  2. Ryan v. Motor Credit Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941
  3. Browner v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. In Re Parkwood, Inc. American Security and Trust Co., Trustee in Reorganization of Parkwood, Inc. v. Equitable Life Insurance Co. In Re Parkwood, Inc. American Security and Trust Co., Trustee in Reorganization of Parkwood, Inc. v. Manufacturers Life Insurance Co. In Re Adams Properties, Inc. American Security and Trust Co., Trustee in Reorganization of Adams Properties, Inc. v. Hartford Life Insurance CoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  5. Indian Lake Estates, Inc. v. Ten Individual Net Limited, Inc., and Special Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API