Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Worcester

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1998No. CV-97-0340-PRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Statement of the Case

BRAMMER, Judge.

¶ 1 Pammela and Donald Worcester’s six-year marriage was dissolved on June 3,1994, pursuant to a stipulated decree incorporating a shared custody agreement relating to K., who was born in August of 1991. Two and one-half months after the decree was entered, Pammela filed a motion to set it aside pursuant to Ariz. R. Civ. P. Rule 60(c), 16 A.R.S., to “delete reference to their [sic] being any child born of the marriage,” and eliminate any “need for custody, visitation or support orders.” The trial court granted the motion after a hearing, effectively…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Daou v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. City of Phoenix v. GeylerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Trollope v. KoernerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  4. Bateman v. McDonaldArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Rosner v. Denim & Diamonds, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1996

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Robert J Nicaise Jr v. Aparna SundaramArizona Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Hobson v. Mid-Century InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  3. J.P.M. v. T.D.M.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State Ex Rel. Department of Economic Security v. WaldrenArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Jana Waldren v. George WaldrenArizona Supreme Court · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API