Legal Opinion

Rieger v. Zackoski

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 25, 1982No. 51219PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*18ROGOSHESKE, Justice.*

This is an appeal taken by defendant Brainerd International Raceway, Inc. (hereinafter BIR) from a judgment and order of the trial court whereby BIR was held to be 32% responsible for plaintiff Gerald Rieger’s personal injuries suffered in a one-car accident occurring on defendant BIR’s premises. BIR claims that the trial court erred in submitting to the jury the issue of whether Rieger was an entrant or trespasser; in its instructions regarding the applicable standard of care; in failing to instruct the jury on the issues of superseding cause and primary assumption of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Peterson v. BalachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  2. Springrose v. WillmoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  3. Armstrong v. MailandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Conover v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. Flom v. FlomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Wartnick v. Moss & BarnettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Larson v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Kirk v. Washington State UniversityWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Kenna v. So-Fro Fabrics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  5. Susan K. Gander and Robert J. Gander v. Mr. Steak of Sun Ray, Inc., a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API