Legal Opinion
In Re Estate of Cross
California Supreme Court
Decided September 24, 1912No. L.A. No. 3121PublishedCited by 11 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
John Cross and Laura L. Cross, his wife, had been married for forty-five years. They were childless and owned property of considerable value. In May, 1898, they executed their joint and mutual wills. By paragraph I of those wills it was provided:
“In the event of the death of either one of the testators herein, if the survivor shall continue living for the period of thirty days thereafter, then and in that event the following terms of this instrument shall prevail, that is to say:
“1. The whole estate of the deceased testator and of the community shall pass to the surviving husband or wife; and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re Estate of PlumelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- In re Estate of LaddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by11 opinions
- Salmonski v. BardzinskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Estate of JamesonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Estate of WiemerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Estate of LoganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Estate of O'BrienCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.