Islam v. Department of Early Learning
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.
¶1 The Department of Early Learning revoked appellant Kurshida Islam’s child care center license. The department’s burden of proof in an adjudicative proceeding, as provided by statute, is the preponderance of the evidence. Islam contends the importance of a licensee’s private interest requires proof by clear and convincing evidence as a matter of due process. But in defining the nature of the State’s interest, the legislature expressly states that the interests of the children in care are “paramount” over the right of any person to provide care. When due weight is given to the State’s…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Nguyen v. STATE HEALTH MED. QUALITY ASSUR.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
- Nguyen v. Department of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Brown v. Department of HealthCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Potelco, Inc. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Olympic Healthcare Services II, LLC v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- David S. Divis v. Washington State PatrolCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Olympic Healthcare Services Ii, V Dshs State Of Wa.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Potelco, Inc. v. State Of Washington Department Of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015