Legal Opinion
Michael v. Ametelco, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 14, 1991PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Andrew V. Siracuse, J.
Plaintiffs, Janise Belmore and Tyrone Michael, have commenced separate actions against the defendants alleging negligence and gross negligence and products liability.1 Defendants have moved pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) to dismiss the complaints in each action on the ground that they are untimely under the applicable Statute of Limitations. Since the legal issues are the same in both cases, the cases are being joined solely for the purpose of the decision on this motion.
Plaintiffs Belmore and Michael are former employees of Rochester Products Division…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Schwartz v. Heyden Newport Chemical Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Steinhardt v. Johns-Manville Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Thornton v. Roosevelt HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Mauro v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Matter of Ny County Des Litig.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Sweeney v. General Printing, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Wetherill v. Eli Lilly & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Braune v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- Kowalski v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.