Kowalski v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
BACKGROUND
CURTIN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Dorothy J. and Louis Kowalski, Jr., bring this action in negligence and strict HabiHty against defendant Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (“Goodyear”). The Kow-alskis aHege that Goodyear failed to prevent the release of ortho-toluidine, an abnormaUy dangerous hazard, from its Niagara Falls plant, contaminating the plaintiffs and causing Mrs. Kowalski to contract bladder cancer. The release occurred when Mr. Kowal-ski, a long-term employee of the defendant, left the plant each day. Although he showered and changed out of his work clothes, the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Pulka v. EdelmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Eiseman v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- B.F. Goodrich Co. v. MurthaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Matter of Nyc Asbestos LitigNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Martin v. Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Rockwell International Corp. v. WilhiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2003
- Angeles Chemical Co. v. Spencer & JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Barnes Ex Rel. Estate of Barnes v. Koppers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.