Legal Opinion

Nemer v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 4, 1963No. 20083PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Day.

We will herein refer to the parties by name or as they appeared in the trial court where the plaintiff in error was the defendant and defendants in error were plaintiffs.

The action is for damages resulting from an automobile collision. The plaintiffs recovered a lump sum money judgment against the defendant in the amount of $11,440.72. Their complaint was not in separate counts and was not for specific damages claimed by the several plaintiffs. The lump sum judgment is one of the points of error urged by the defendant.

Other errors claimed are that the trial court’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fabling v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
  2. Wilcox v. SwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. Prentiss v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  4. Behr v. McCoySupreme Court of Colorado · 1958

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Moyer v. MerrickSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  2. Board of Cty. Com'n of Cty. of Delta v. OgburnColorado Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Nishika Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  4. Hernandez v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1974
  5. Grahn v. Truck Insurance ExchangeColorado Court of Appeals · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API