Mustar v. McComb
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal froto Circuit Court, Spink County. Hon. Alva E. Taylor, Juidlgie. On rehearing.
1Opinion of the CourtWhiting, P. J.
[i] This cause iiis before us upon rehearing. Our farmer opinion will be found reported in Mustar v. McComb, 39 S. D. 439, 164 N. W. 975, to which reference is made for a statement of slclme of the facts and for our holding thereon. In such former opinion it was stated that the action “was brought to determine the ownership” of certain land. Such statement is not accurate. Plaintiff, claiming to be the owner of certain land', brought this action, to restrain, defendants from selling such lanld under an exeouitiloln issued upon a judgment taken against one G. H. Brown; lalnlcl plaintiff sought…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Booth v. HoskinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Dutton v. WarschauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Hall v. ArnottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Raynor v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Coburn v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fuller v. MiddaughSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956