Legal Opinion

Vinson v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided March 21, 2007No. 01-05-00784-CRPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TIM TAFT, Justice.

A jury convicted appellant, Raymond Earl Vinson, of assault on a household or family member and interference with an emergency telephone call. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. §§ 22.01(a)(1), (b)(2), 42.062(a) (Vernon 2003). After appellant had pleaded true in the assault ease to an enhancement allegation that he had previously been convicted of murder, 1 the trial court assessed appellant’s punishment at 365 days in jail and a $500 fine for both cases, with jail time to run concurrently. See id. §§ 12.21, 12.43(a) (Vernon 2003). We determine (1) whether the trial court erred…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Zuliani v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  5. Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Vinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  2. Martinez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2007
  3. Long v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Lollis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2007
  5. Orlando Salinas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API