State v. Epps
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
BARISONEK, J.S.C.
The defendant was previously convicted of a criminal offense and was placed on probation. He was subsequently charged with a violation of probation, was found to be in violation and was continued on probation. The State during trial sought to introduce as evidence the defendant’s conviction and subsequent violation of probation, if the defendant testified, to attack his credibility. The nature of the conviction, the sentence, the violation of probation and resentence were not contested.
It is generally recognized that a defendant who takes the stand in his or her own behalf…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- McGautha v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. SandsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- Davenport v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. JenkinsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997