Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Summit County

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 2002No. 2001-1328PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

{¶ 1} From 1977 to 1993, 26 residential subdivisions were built in what was then known as Hudson Township. Pursuant to contracts between appellant and cross-appellee Summit County and the developers of those subdivisions, water lines were constructed at the developers’ expense and then conveyed to Summit *297County. In exchange, the county allowed the developers to connect the water system to the county’s existing water service facilities.

{¶ 2} On January 1, 1994, the village of Hudson and Hudson Township merged to create appellee and cross-appellant, city of Hudson. Five years later, Hudson…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Board of County Commissioners v. Village of MarbleheadOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. City of Northwood v. Wood County Regional Water & Sewer DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hudson v. Summit Cty.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Village of Grafton v. Rural Lorain County Water AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API