Legal Opinion
Village of Grafton v. Rural Lorain County Water Authority
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided April 16, 2004No. 1:02 CV 2037 to 1:02 CV 2039PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
POLSTER, District Judge.
Before the Court are the following cross-motions for summary judgment:
1. Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Village of Grafton and KNG, Ltd. (“Grafton’s Motion”) (Case No. 1:02 CV 2037, ECF No. 40; Case No. 1:02 CV 2039, ECF No. 11) and
2. Motion for Summary Judgment of Rural Lorain County Water Authority (“RLCWA’s Motion”) (ECF No. 41). 1
The parties have agreed that this case involves a legal issue which can be resolved entirely on written briefs. 2 For the following reasons, Grafton’s Motion is DENIED and the RLCWA’s Motion is GRANTED.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- North Carolina v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- 60 Ivy Street Corporation (86-5500), and Coldwell Banker Commercial Group, Inc., (86-5517) v. R.C. Alexander and Doris AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Vincent C. Wiley v. United States of America Citizens Federal Mortgage Corporation State of Ohio Franklin County Treasurer and Houng ThaiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Northern Ohio Rural Water v. Erie County Board of County CommissionersDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004