Legal Opinion

McKesson Corp. v. Chauffeurs, Teamsters, & Helpers Local Union No. 150

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 13, 1991No. CIV. S-90-0736 WBSPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM-AND ORDER

SHUBB, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on the parties’, cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff requests the court to vacate an arbitration award. Defendant requests the court to confirm the award and to grant its request for attorney’s fees. Summary judgment is appropriate when it is demonstrated that there exists no genuine issue as to any material fact, and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c); Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 157, 90 S.Ct. 1598, 1607, 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970); Poller v.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. HechlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Warehouse, Processing, Distribution Workers Union v. Hugo Neu Proler Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API