Legal Opinion
Fireman's Fund Insurance Companies v. Quackenbush
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 3, 1997No. A074767PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HANING, J.
Defendant and appellant Charles Quackenbush, as Insurance Commissioner of the State of California (the Commissioner), appeals an order directing him to set aside his prehearing decision concerning admission of evidence in the Proposition 103 (Ins. Code, § 1861.01 et seq.) rate reduction hearing of plaintiff and respondent Fireman’s Fund Insurance Companies (Fireman’s Fund). We affirm.
Background
On November 8, 1988, the voters approved an initiative familiarly known as Proposition 103. Proposition 103 enacts a statutory scheme requiring insurers to reduce the rates of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Gikas v. ZolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- 20th Century Insurance v. GaramendiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Citizens Utilities Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Automotive Funding Group, Inc. v. GaramendiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Economic Empowerment Foundation v. QuackenbushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- 20th Century Ins. Co. v. QuackenbushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Goldstein v. Cal. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- 20th Century Insurance v. QuackenbushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.