Legal Opinion
Miele v. Miele
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 13, 1953PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
25 N.J. Super. 220 (1953)
95 A.2d 768
THERESA F. MIELE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
JOSEPH MIELE, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided January 13, 1953.
Mr. Sidney C. Swirsky (Mr. Samuel H. Nelson, appearing), attorney for the plaintiff.
Messrs. Bilder, Bilder & Kaufman (Mr. Nathan Bilder, appearing), attorney for defendant.
TOMASULO, A.M.
The parties in this litigation were divorced by a decree of divorce of the State of Nevada. The relevant portion of the decree which furnishes the background for the instant controversy reads as follows:
"IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Haddock v. HaddockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Sherrer v. SherrerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Sistare v. SistareSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Coe v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Woodhouse v. WoodhouseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Estate of Barrett v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
- Roskein v. RoskeinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Schlemm v. SchlemmSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Estate of Barrett v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971