Legal Opinion
Brown v. Klein
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 9, 1928No. Docket No. 6068PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUCAS, J., pro tem.
Appeal is taken from a judgment in favor of plaintiff decreeing rescission of a contract of copartnership and requiring defendants to refund to plaintiff the money paid by him on account thereof.
The complaint alleges that plaintiff and defendants entered into a contract whereby plaintiff agreed to buy and the defendants agreed to sell an undivided one-third interest in and to a certain copartnership known as the Universal Specialty Company, subject to existing liabilities as of October 27, 1923. Plaintiff agreed to pay, and did pay, defendants the sum of $3,000 for such…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Scott v. Delta Land & Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
- Lombardi v. SinanidesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Canadian Agency, Ltd. v. Assets Realization Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Watkins v. LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by5 opinions
- Simone v. McKeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- RELIANCE FINANCE CORPORATION and Romer, O’Connor & Co., Inc., Appellants, v. Clyde E. MILLER and Arline A. Miller, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Crocker-Anglo National Bank v. KuchmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Edwards v. LangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Rhoads v. LeonardDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1953