Legal Opinion
Crocker-Anglo National Bank v. Kuchman
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 5, 1964No. Civ. 10702PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.
Appellants brought this action against respondents to rescind the sale of all the capital stock in a certain corporation. The case came to trial before a jury. When after a dismissal of one of the counts of the complaint appellants refused to introduce evidence to support the remaining allegations of the complaint, judgment of nonsuit was entered for respondents. The judgment was appealed to this court, but the appeal was dismissed because a cross-complaint then pending prevented the judgment from being final. (Grocker-Anglo National Bank v. Kuchman, 194 Cal. App.2d 589 [15 Cal.Rptr. 230].)…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- M. F. Kemper Construction Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Mary Pickford Co. v. Bayly Bros., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Feeney v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Orloff v. Metropolitan Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Hays v. TempleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Davies v. KrasnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Main v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- A. Teichert & Son, Inc. v. State of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- Wyler v. FeuerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- RELIANCE FINANCE CORPORATION and Romer, O’Connor & Co., Inc., Appellants, v. Clyde E. MILLER and Arline A. Miller, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.