Legal Opinion

Alson Investment Co. v. Youngquist

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 18, 1940No. 14,785PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Plaintiffs in error are hereinafter referred to as the Alson company and the Casualty company; defendants in error Youngquist and Youngren as the claimants, or by name; the other defendants as the commission, the fund, and the Rockwell company, respectively; and one Frank Youngquist, deceased, as the deceased.

This is a workmen’s compensation case. The claimants proceeded separately, but since the same accident was involved in each case and the evidence was identical, they were heard jointly by the commission and, by agreement, tried as one by the court, hence we so treat them.

Deceased and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Radiator Co. v. FranzenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  2. Index Mines Corp. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  3. Industrial Com. v. BrackenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. BatisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  2. Stewart v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  3. Industrial Commission v. State Compensation Insurance FundSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  4. Stewart v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API