Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Primeline Advisory, Inc.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 3, 1995No. 71,337PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Six, J.:

This is a first impression statute of limitations case arising under K.S.A. 17-1268(a), the civil liabilities section of the Kan sas Securities Act (the Act), K.S.A. 17-1252 et seq. The district court concluded that the statutory claims of James and Ellen Kelly were barred by K.S.A. 60-512(2), a three-year statute of limitations. The paramount question is when a fraud-based K.S.A. 17-1268(a) action commences under K.S.A. 60-512(2) — upon discovery of the fraud or at the time of sale of the security.

The Kellys appeal the decision entered against…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Blue Sky L. Rep. P 72,496, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,186 Thorburn Kennedy, Trustee v. Josephthal & Company, Inc., Edward M. Swartz and Fredric SwartzCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  3. Todd v. KellySupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  4. Gillespie v. SeymourSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  5. Zobrist v. Coal-X, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Law v. Law Co. Building AssociatesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  2. Burnett v. Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  3. Eastman v. Coffeyville Resources Refining & Marketing LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  4. Bagby v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2000
  5. Bonura v. SifersCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API